EU AI Act Article 50 — 20 days to seal | Get passport

Competitor Comparison Matrix

DEFONEOS vs Palantir vs Anduril vs Helsing vs Shield AI across 25 capabilities.

Capability	DEFONEOS	Palantir	Anduril	Helsing	Shield AI
Open Source	✅ Apache 2.0	❌ Closed	❌ Closed	❌ Closed	❌ Closed
UK Sovereign	✅ UK (16939677)	❌ US	❌ US	🇪🇺 EU	❌ US
Land Domain	✅ 8 systems	Data only	✅ Lattice	Limited	Limited
Sea Domain	✅ 8 systems	Data only	Dive-LD	❌	❌
Air Domain	✅ 8 systems	Data only	Fury	Targeting	Hivemind
Space Domain	✅ 8 systems	Partners	❌	❌	❌
Cyber Domain	✅ 12 systems	Limited	❌	❌	❌
EW / Spectrum	✅ 8 systems	❌	Partners	❌	❌
Cognitive / PSYOPS	✅ 7 systems	❌	❌	❌	❌
Biological / CBRN	✅ 6 systems	❌	❌	❌	❌
Total Domains	12	4	4	1	2
Cryptographic Audit	✅ Ed25519 SIGIL	Centralized	❌	❌	❌
BFT Governance	✅ 33-node	❌	❌	❌	❌
Intuition Layer	✅ 14 models	❌	❌	❌	❌
Swarm Agents	✅ 4 types	❌	Basic	❌	❌
5D Simulation	✅ SOV SPACE	❌	Basic	❌	❌
Three Hats (W+B+G)	✅ Only one	White only	Grey only	Grey only	Grey only
Entry Price	£50K/yr	$50M+/yr	$5M+/yr	€2M+/yr	Quote-based
EU AI Act Compliance	✅ Built-in	❌	❌	Partial	❌
JSP 936 Compliance	✅ Built-in	❌	❌	❌	❌
Open Ontology	✅ RDF/OWL	Proprietary	❌	❌	❌
Offline / Air-gapped	✅ D3 capable	❌	Partial	❌	Partial
Post-Quantum Crypto	✅ ML-KEM-768	❌	❌	❌	❌
Community Version	✅ Free	❌	❌	❌	❌

DEFONEOS wins on 24/25 capabilities. The only loss: Palantir has more field-deployed experience (but they've had 20 years and $50B+ in funding).