EU AI Act Article 50 — 20 days to seal | Get passport
Co-pilot commercial pack

Meeting Notes to SoW Converter

A static conversion page that turns first-meeting notes into a 90-day DEFONEOS statement of work: buyer problem, scope, data boundary, governance, success metrics, commercial route, and risks.

8intake fields
3work packages
90dpilot horizon
5default risks
Use now: open this page during the owner workflow, copy the relevant block, verify the honesty register, then log the result in the DEFONEOS CRM. This is designed for a 30 minute action window, not for passive reading.

Converter purpose

After a meeting, the owner should be able to turn notes into a one-page statement of work without inventing scope. This page gives the slots, the guardrails, and the paste-ready output.

Meeting notes intake

Fill these eight rows immediately after the call.

FieldQuestionConstraint
Problem statementWhat the buyer actually said, in their words.One paragraph, no sales language.
ScopeThe smallest 90-day pilot that can prove or falsify value.Three work packages max.
Data boundaryPublic, synthetic, or buyer-provided data classes.No personal surveillance by default.
GovernanceHuman oversight, audit log, red-line checks, decision record.JSP 936 and NIST AI RMF mapping.
Success metricsOperational, commercial, and assurance metrics.Baseline plus target plus owner.
CommercialFixed price, milestones, payment terms, optional extensions.No per-seat trap.
RisksTop five risks and mitigations.Include human gates.
Next stepA dated validation slot or procurement route.One ask only.

One-page SoW output template

Copy this into a document after filling the intake rows.

DEFONEOS 90-day sovereign pilot — draft SoW

Buyer problem
[Use the buyer words. One paragraph.]

Pilot objective
Prove whether DEFONEOS can deliver [outcome] using UK-sovereign, audit-grade, signed, neutral architecture without personal surveillance or kinetic-targeting patterns.

Work package 1 — Evidence and controls
- Map buyer use case to JSP 936, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, UK GDPR, and OSCAL evidence.
- Produce a signed evidence-room bundle and red-line register.

Work package 2 — Public-source integration demo
- Connect only approved public, synthetic, or buyer-provided non-sensitive data.
- Demonstrate Common Operating Picture, audit trail, and human oversight.

Work package 3 — Assurance and procurement route
- Produce go or no-go report, residual-risk register, pricing route, and next procurement vehicle.

Success metrics
1. [metric] baseline [x] target [y]
2. [metric] baseline [x] target [y]
3. [metric] baseline [x] target [y]

Commercial
Fixed pilot fee: [choose from pricing card]
Milestones: 30 percent start, 40 percent midpoint, 30 percent final acceptance
Owner gates: DSP, CE Plus, SC, procurement route, buyer data access

Honesty
Draft only until buyer validates scope and procurement route. No endorsement, no certification, no controlled technical data.

Pilot package selector

Use this table to choose the first commercial route.

Buyer stateRecommended packageRationale
Discovery onlyTechnical validation sprintLow friction, validates pain before procurement
Named project and budget90-day sovereign pilotBuyer has need and route, but wants bounded risk
Security-led buyerEvidence-room plus assurance sprintTrust is the blocker, not features
Procurement-led buyerG-Cloud or DASA route packRoute matters more than demo
Prime or consortiumReferral partner letter plus SoWThey need partner-safe language and margin clarity

Risk register starter

Every SoW needs these risks stated openly.

Acceptance criteria library

Select three to five criteria only.

Owner handover checklist

Before sending the SoW, run this checklist.

Milestone and payment schedule

Use this when a buyer asks how the 90-day pilot is governed commercially. Keep it capped and measurable.

DayMilestoneDeliverablePayment trigger
Day 0Kickoff and evidence boundarySigned scope, data classes, owner gates, communication rhythm30 percent on start
Day 15Control mapJSP 936, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, UK GDPR, and OSCAL starter mapNo payment, review gate
Day 30First public-source demoNon-sensitive common operating picture, audit log, human oversight record40 percent on midpoint acceptance
Day 60Assurance reviewRisk register, red-line audit, evidence-room bundle, procurement routeNo payment, decision gate
Day 90Final go or no-goFinal report, residual risks, next-route recommendation, extension or closeout30 percent on final acceptance

Clause library

These clauses are safe starter language. They are not legal advice and should be reviewed before signature.

Worked example — public resilience pilot

This example shows how to fill the SoW without creating an overbroad platform promise.

SlotFilled example
Buyer problemRegional teams lack a single audit-grade view of public-source weather, transport, and service-disruption signals during resilience planning.
ObjectiveValidate whether DEFONEOS can produce a public-source common operating picture with human oversight and signed evidence logs.
ScopeThree feeds, two dashboards, one evidence-room bundle, one final go or no-go report.
Out of scopeNo personal data, no emergency-service live dispatch integration, no classified feeds, no automated operational decision.
Success metricNamed stakeholder can answer what changed, why, and who approved it from the audit log within five minutes.
Commercial routeCapped 90-day pilot from the pricing card, then route to G-Cloud or prime partner if value is validated.

12-framework crosswalk

Every page in this tick is written as an owner-executable artefact and an audit trail. These mappings are design mappings, not third-party certifications.

FrameworkHow this page mapsHonesty status
EU AI ActTransparency, human oversight, logging, post-market monitoring, and high-risk discipline when a workflow crosses into regulated public-service use.Designed control language. Verify per-buyer before external submission.
GDPR and UK GDPRData minimisation, lawful basis notes, retention windows, subject-access response path, and no personal-surveillance pattern.Designed control language. Verify per-buyer before external submission.
JSP 936Assurance case language, operator accountability, safety case evidence, and escalation logging suitable for UK defence AI review.Designed control language. Verify per-buyer before external submission.
JSP 440Protective marking, supplier-security posture, evidence handling, and separation of public facts from owner-gated sensitive data.Designed control language. Verify per-buyer before external submission.
NIST AI RMFMap, Measure, Manage, and Govern rows for every buyer artefact, with clear residual-risk ownership.Designed control language. Verify per-buyer before external submission.
ISO 42001AI management-system controls, role ownership, change control, review cadence, and documented competence.Designed control language. Verify per-buyer before external submission.
NIST PQCCryptographic-agility language, no false PQC certification claim, and upgrade path for signed evidence bundles.Designed control language. Verify per-buyer before external submission.
NATO STANAGInteroperability language only, no NATO endorsement claim, and neutral alliance-compatible evidence formatting.Designed control language. Verify per-buyer before external submission.
AUKUS Pillar IIAUKUS-compatible technology framing only, no partnership claim unless a signed letter exists.Designed control language. Verify per-buyer before external submission.
OSCALMachine-readable control catalogue and component-definition path for the evidence room.Designed control language. Verify per-buyer before external submission.
Five Eyes export disciplinePublic-source and EAR ITAR awareness note, no controlled technical data in the page.Designed control language. Verify per-buyer before external submission.
C2PA 2.0Content provenance, artefact signing, and media lineage notation for decks, screenshots, and demo recordings.Designed control language. Verify per-buyer before external submission.

Honesty register

The register below is deliberately explicit so the artefact stays usable in a UK-sovereign procurement conversation without overclaiming.